Blog

To many practitioners, grant writing remains a formulaic exercise: answer the questions, include data points, proofread, and move on to whatever else the day demands. This cycle has persisted due in large part to the demands on development professionals and organizational leadership. Too few hours and too many responsibilities, all tinged with the anxiety of budget pressures and an uncertain funding landscape. Such pressures do not preclude a reconsideration of best practices, though.&nbsp; The best proposals are translations. The best writers are interpreters. Whereas many proposals emerge from a position of “here’s how great the organization is,” they often sacrifice depth of alignment for ease of presentation. The origin of the presentation matters greatly, and when writers craft their prose more completely from the reviewer’s perspective–ascertained from meetings and other communication–they develop more compelling applications.&nbsp;My proposed reorientation goes well beyond the typical statements of alignment between nonprofit and funder priorities. By adopting the complete perspective of their program officer–including the needs of their portfolio, their delivery of information during past meetings, and the historical trends within their organization–writers can refine their entire proposal. Beyond content, the astute applicant curates the types and amount of data, its presentation, the tenor of the prose, its rhetorical construction, and even the degree of concision.&nbsp; When writers adopt this approach, the reviewer will work less when considering an application; it’s already in terms natural to them. Coupled with an established relationship, the written and spoken word coalesce into a holistic connection that engenders trust and appreciation. These abstract qualities materialize into tangible financial benefits.&nbsp;

Authorial Perspective in Grant Writing

Nonprofit use of AI has come under increasing scrutiny, and not just by those concerned with the impact of data centers on the health and environment of surrounding communities. (1) There is, rather, a subtler consequence of AI that impacts the core of every nonprofit: employee and stakeholder detachment from mission.Consider this likely scenario: a nonprofit uses AI to generate their monthly donor newsletter. The use of this technology greatly optimizes composition speed and frees employees from a perennial burden. At first, the usage appears to have little, if any, downside. Yet AI can (and often does) make mistakes, even basic grammatical ones. A changed name, an incorrect dollar amount, or a lexical blunder can damage months, even years, of relationship building. In a field so reliant upon social, as much as fiscal, capital, tears in the fabric of trust can run longer than anticipated.Beyond mechanical mishaps, however, are AI’s corrosive consequences concerning employee and donor detachment from mission consciousness that inevitably arise from increased reliance upon AI for newsletters and other media. Feeding ChatGPT or Gemini your organization's materials for a newsletter means that employees do not have to do the mental work of studying and understanding the information themselves. Teams rely upon communication and shared knowledge, and a lack of understanding in one area gradually blunts the entire organization's knowledge of what they are and where they are going, resulting in a lackluster ability to communicate these ideals to donors and prospects.(2)What began as a means of saving time and effort results in a creeping, ubiquitous inability of staff to speak authoritatively and energetically about the organization’s mission. The furnace driving passion and interest gradually cools, and the organization’s gears grind to a halt. And in reality, written materials are only the start. The pitch garners interest, but staff must tailor materials to whomever is in front of them by drawing upon reservoirs of experience and knowledge. Why shortchange these critical abilities by removing the training ground?This is not to say that AI cannot benefit nonprofits. Rather, organizations should consider the tradeoffs and long-term consequences of certain types of use. Rising skepticism over AI’s ability to embody an organization’s tone or accurately summarize its novel services and developments may even open opportunities for nonprofits to emphasize the human-centered work they do and the minds and hands communicating their stories. Nothing should be a greater advocate of your organization’s mission than yourself. Why outsource your passion?&nbsp; 1. For examples of environmental and social impact concerns, see ​​<a data-mce-href="https://www.apha.org/publications/public-health-newswire/public-health-newswire/articles/addressing-the-growing-environmental-harms-of-ai-data-centers" href="https://www.apha.org/publications/public-health-newswire/public-health-newswire/articles/addressing-the-growing-environmental-harms-of-ai-data-centers">https://www.apha.org/publications/public-health-newswire/public-health-newswire/articles/addressing-the-growing-environmental-harms-of-ai-data-centers</a> and <a href="https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/RPT2_2602_DataCenterMoratorium.pdf" data-mce-href="https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/RPT2_2602_DataCenterMoratorium.pdf">https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/RPT2_2602_DataCenterMoratorium.pdf</a>&nbsp;2. For a discussion of AI’s impact on metacognitive degradation, see Beware of metacognitive laziness: <a data-mce-href="https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjet.13544" href="https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjet.13544">Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance - Fan - 2025 - British Journal of Educational Technology - Wiley Online Library</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp;

AI and Mission Engagement

Grants issued by the federal government remain accessible and lucrative, but have grown increasingly competitive, requiring nonprofits to demonstrate robust systems for award stewardship, scalability, and data collection. Organizations are best positioned when they pursue federal funding selectively--avoiding mission creep--and doing so after establishing internal management structures. A few points of guidance for those seeking these dollars in 2026:1. Be selective. Assess mission fit, competition, match requirements, reimbursement terms, and staff capacity before applying.&nbsp;2. Determine depth of alignment. Show clearly how your program advances the agency’s goals, not just why your work matters. Program officers need to justify their selections to their Department.3. Evidence, Evidence, Evidence. Highlight data, measurable outcomes, community need, and your data collection apparatus. 4. Prepare for compliance. Ensure financial controls, cost tracking, reporting systems, and documentation practices are ready before an award arrives. AgoraQuill is ready to help your nonprofit acheive these first steps. Reach out to us at <a href="mailto:info@agoraquill.com" data-mce-href="mailto:info@agoraquill.com">info@agoraquill.com</a> to schedule a 30-minute exploratory meeting.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;

Assessing and Accessing Federal Funding

Nonprofit fundraising has always been challenging, especially for those who have to "wear many hats" to serve their communities. In recent years, however, we have noticed several paradigm shifts in the funding landscape. The nonprofit leaders who understand these shifts defining the philanthropic landscape will be the ones to grow their impact in 2026 and beyond.🔹 Fewer donors, similar giving: Total charitable dollars remain about the same, but the number of donors has declined for the fourth consecutive year. Targeted research and alignment efforts will lead to quality and sustaining funding relationships.🔹 Quantifiable impact to the fore: Major funders are increasingly focused on measurable impact, unrestricted funding, and long-term partnership models. Venture-style philanthropy is gaining traction across sectors, reflecting a broader shift toward outcomes, sustainability, and reinvestment. Those leaders who express their organization’s value most clearly will get the dollars.🔹 Data &amp; research are key: Data-driven fundraising, AI-supported engagement, and new digital channels are no longer optional. Organizations that leverage cutting-edge research insights to personalize outreach will outperform those that do not.In short, fundraising success now depends on strategy, not just activity. To discuss your nonprofit’s needs and potential avenues for collaboration, contact Dr. Jon Churchill (<a data-mce-href="mailto:jon@agoraquill.com" href="mailto:jon@agoraquill.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">jon@agoraquill.com</a>), Founder &amp; Principal at AgoraQuill Solutions, to set up a free 30-minute consultation.

Growing Trends in Nonprofit Fundraising

AgoraQuill Solutions

At AgoraQuill Solutions, we help nonprofits stabilize and grow their funding with practical, right-sized support. We build capacity in grant writing and major gifts, develop and implement fundraising strategies, offer philanthropic and funding landscape insight, and invigorate event funding and sponsorships.